Skip to main content Skip to navigation
Washington State University
CAS Connect Summer 2015

Breakthrough study links sleep loss, decision disasters

The difference between life and death in the operating room, on the battlefield, or during a police shootout often comes down to the ability to adapt to the unexpected. Sleep deprivation may hinder that ability, according to an interdisciplinary WSU study recently published in the journal Sleep.

WSU psychologists and sleep researchers created the first-ever laboratory experiment that simulates how sleep loss affects critical aspects of decision making in high-stakes, real-world situations. Their breakthrough work provides a new understanding of how going without sleep for long periods can lead doctors, first responders, military personnel, and others in crisis situations to make catastrophic decisions.

Overcoming challenge of lab research
Putting sleep-deprived people in perilous environments is ‘risky business,’ says WSU researcher.

Recent history is filled with examples of the devastating consequences of people operating without enough sleep.

Investigations of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant meltdown, the Exxon Valdez oil tanker grounding, and the space shuttle Challenger explosion all concluded that sleep-deprived operators had a role in causing the accidents.

A long-standing conundrum for sleep scientists has been to create a controlled lab situation that sufficiently simulates the circumstances that lead to severe lapses in real-world judgment. Previous laboratory research consistently showed sleep loss degrades attention, but its effects on demanding tests of cognition, such as decision making, appeared to be relatively small.

“There has been a disconnect between decision making in the lab, where the effects of sleep loss appeared to be minimal, and decision making in the real world where sleep loss can lead to big problems,” said Paul Whitney, CAS associate dean and professor of psychology. “Our goal was to bridge the gap and capture the essential elements of real-world decision making in a laboratory experiment.”

Adapting to feedback crucial
Paul Whitney
Paul Whitney

In a natural context, decision making is a dynamic process that requires a person to learn what is going on nearby as a result of changing circumstances and his or her actions. A surgeon, for instance, might notice a change in a patient’s vital signs midway through a procedure. The surgeon can then use this feedback to decide a better course of action.

“A novel aspect of this study was using a simple laboratory task that captures the essential aspect of real-world decision making of adapting to new information in a changing situation,” said John Hinson, professor of psychology. “Prior studies of sleep loss and decision making have not realized how important adapting to changing circumstances is in determining when sleep loss will lead to decision making failures.”

John Hinson, psychology
John Hinson

Whitney, Hinson, and Hans Van Dongen, director of the WSU Sleep and Performance Research Center at WSU Spokane, along with Melinda Jackson, now of the RMIT University, Victoria, Australia, recruited 26 healthy adults to take part in their study conducted at the Spokane sleep center.

For six days and nights, the participants lived in a hotel-like laboratory where they performed a specially designed reversal learning task to test their ability to use feedback to guide future decisions.

After two days of being allowed regular sleep, to establish an experimental baseline, half of the group was deprived of sleep for 62 hours and the other half was allowed normal rest. After the period of sleep deprivation, both groups were put back on a similar sleep schedule for the remainder of the experiment.

Mid-study switch confounds sleep deprived

In the learning task, the participants were shown a series of numbers that, unknown to them, were pre-assigned to have either a “go” (response) or “no go” (non-response) value. They had less than a second to decide whether to respond to each number shown.

Every time they correctly identified a number with a “go” value, they received a fictitious monetary reward. Errors resulted in a loss.

After a while, both the sleep-deprived group and the controls started to catch on and selected the right numbers. Then the tricky part came. The researchers reversed the contingencies so that participants had to withhold a response to the “go” numbers and respond to the “no go” numbers.

The switch confounded the sleep deprived participants. Even after being shown 40 numbers with reversed contingencies, they had almost zero success. On the other hand, the rested participants would catch on to the switch within 8-16 numbers.

Implications of sleep-loss risk

The data show that no matter how hard a person wants to make the right choice, sleep loss does something to the brain that simply prevents it from effectively using feedback. The study provides a new tool for investigating how sleep deprivation produces decision errors in real-life situations where information emerges over time.

“People in high-stakes environments are held accountable for their actions when they are fatigued just like everyone else,” Van Dongen said. “However, we now know that when someone is sleep-deprived their brain simply can’t process feedback from their actions and changing circumstances.

“Our findings tell us that putting sleep-deprived people in perilous environments is an inherently risky business and raises a number of medical, legal, and financial implications,” he said.